Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531897›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Automated Detection and Monitoring of Ground-Nesting Bee Nests Using Drone Imagery and Deep Learning.

Philippe Tschanz, Thomas Renggli, Jonas Winizki, Achim Walter, Matthias Albrecht, Thomas Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philippe TschanzAgroscope, Agroecology and Environment Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-5154
Thomas RenggliAgroscope, Agroecology and Environment Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1064-7544
Jonas WinizkiAgroscope, Agroecology and Environment Zurich Switzerland.
Achim WalterDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-9643
Matthias AlbrechtAgroscope, Agroecology and Environment Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-3455
Thomas KellerAgroscope, Agroecology and Environment Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9383-3209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bees that nest in the soil in self-excavated burrows comprise the majority of wild bee species and provide important pollination and soil functions, yet many species are threatened. Conservation efforts for ground-nesting bees are often hindered by limited knowledge of their nesting habitat requirements, in part because nests are difficult to locate and efficient methods for monitoring nesting sites are lacking. Automated detection and monitoring of soil mounds (tumuli) produced by ground-nesting bees, indicating nest presence, could provide new insights into bee nesting biology and population dynamics while also providing crucial data to support conservation and management. Image-based methods, such as the automated acquisition of high-resolution aerial imagery using drones combined with modern computer vision techniques, offer a promising path toward scalable systems for detecting and monitoring bee nest tumuli across large areas. Here, we evaluate the feasibility of integrating drone-based image acquisition with deep learning to detect tumuli representing bee nests and to distinguish them from other soil surface deposits, such as earthworm casts. We demonstrate this approach on a 120 m

Indexed as

computer visiondeep learningdrone imageryground‐nesting beespollinator conservationpollinator monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41531897
PMCPMC12795561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.