ArticleBrain circulation
Nexfin versus conventional oscillometric cuff for blood pressure monitoring during neuro-endovascular procedures.
Article in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNexfin, a noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring system, can provide continuous real-time measurements of BP, which can be useful for patients with acute neurological injury who require urgent neuroendovascular interventions. While Nexfin has shown promising reliability for other clinical scenarios, its performance has not been demonstrated during neuroendovascular procedures for patients with neurological injury.
methodsThis was a single-center retrospective study. Consecutive patients who underwent neuro-endovascular procedures with Nexfin BP monitoring were identified at a single institution. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic BP (SBP) from Nexfin, conventional oscillometric cuff, and arterial line were recorded every 5 to 15 min Concordance between measurement modalities was assessed. Nexfin's ability to detect the significant drops in BP (MAP decrease of 10 or more or SBP decrease of 20 or more) on the arterial line was also assessed and compared with cuff.
resultsA total of 620 blood measurements (264 Nexfin, 197 cuff, and 159 arterial line) from 33 patients who underwent neuro-endovascular procedures were collected. Overall, Nexfin measurements correlated well with the arterial line measurements for MAP (Pearson's R = 0.74,
conclusionsFor patients undergoing neuro-endovascular treatments, Nexfin performed as well as conventional cuffs in estimating intraoperative BP measurements from arterial lines, and it was more sensitive than cuffs in detecting intraprocedural relative hypotension without compromising specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.