Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531876›Full record

ReviewBrain circulation

A literature review on neuron scaffolding for repairing peripheral nerves: Advances, challenges, and future directions.

Alexander Weiss, Yuchuan Ding, Matthew Rodriguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander WeissDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Yuchuan DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Matthew RodriguezDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) present significant clinical challenges and affect a substantial portion of the population. Current treatments often fall short of desirable outcomes, leading to a diminished quality of life for patients. Advancements in neuron scaffolding materials offer promising solutions to enhance the clinical management of PNIs and address the limitations of traditional treatments. This paper assesses the current state of treatments, examines the anatomy and physiology of peripheral nerves, and discusses the mechanisms of PNIs and their impact on recovery. It also explores the principles of neuron scaffolding and recent advancements in various natural and synthetic biomaterials. This review focuses on collagen, fibrin, chitosan, poly (lactic acid), poly (glycolic acid), and polycaprolactone (PCL), detailing each material's advantages and challenges in neuron scaffolding applications. This review paper focuses on the innovative use of neuron scaffolding in the treatment of PNIs, emphasizing the potential of both natural and synthetic biomaterials to enhance nerve regeneration. The study underlines the promising future of neuron scaffolding while acknowledging the current limitations that need to be addressed for more effective treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Chitosancollagenfibrinpolycaprolactonepoly (glycolic acid)poly (lactic acid)

Identifiers

PMID41531876
PMCPMC12795485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.