Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531847›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2025

Reviewer Engagement Trends at a Journal: Cause for Concern.

Christopher P Morley, Jacob Prunuske, Julie P Phillips, Andrea L Wendling, Joel J Heidelbaugh, Sam Grammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher P MorleyDepartment of Family Medicine, Norton College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
Jacob PrunuskeDepartment of Family Medicine, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD.
Julie P PhillipsDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI.
Andrea L WendlingDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI.
Joel J HeidelbaughDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Sam GrammerSociety of Teachers of Family Medicine, Leawood, KS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Securing peer reviewers for scholarly manuscripts is essential to journal operations but has become increasingly challenging. Previous Methods: We conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of reviewer invitation outcomes for all research manuscripts submitted to Results: Invitation acceptance peaked at 56.14% in 2020, then declined to 35.71% in 2024 and 38.58% in 2025-the lowest since journal inception. Logistic regression revealed a significant negative annual trend (OR=0.656, Conclusion: Reviewer responsiveness to

Identifiers

PMID41531847
PMCPMC12795567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.