ArticlePeerJ2026
Beneath the canopy, beneath the ground: how surface microhabitats shape cave communities.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecosystem dynamics are shaped by spatial and temporal fluctuations in resource availability and species composition across the landscape. Caves exemplify this interconnectedness, as they rely on allochthonous inputs and surface climatic conditions, fostering communities composed of viable populations from both surface and subterranean habitats. Consequently, effective management and conservation of subterranean environments require the protection of adjacent surface ecosystems, a particularly urgent need in the Amazonian ferruginous hills, where mineral exploitation poses a significant threat. In this context, we investigated how vegetation cover and environmental variables influence the distribution of surface and subterranean fauna, and which factors should guide conservation strategies. We sampled six caves and ten epigean transects around each, encompassing both ombrophilous forest and canga (savanna over ferruginous crusts). Environmental structure variables were recorded for all transects. Significant differences were detected between forest and canga in terms of vegetation structure, microclimate, species richness, and community composition. Species most similar to those found in caves were associated with forest leaf litter, particularly in transects closest to cave entrances. Leaf litter depth emerged as a key factor facilitating faunal overlap between surface and subterranean habitats, likely by providing microhabitats with stable temperature and humidity. In contrast, faunal similarity in canga occurred only under specific conditions, namely, milder temperatures, deeper litter layers, and increased canopy cover. Our findings demonstrate that cave-dwelling species in Amazonian ferruginous systems also inhabit adjacent forest environments, which should be prioritized for conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.