Observational studyPeerJ2026
A narrow therapeutic window of platelet P2Y
Observational study in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Clinical Evidence with PBPK Modeling to Assess PPI-Clopidogrel-CYP2C19 Interactions in Chinese ACS Patients.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Observational
- Beyond Linear Risk: A U-Shaped Association Between Platelet Reactivity and Mortality in Coronary Artery Disease.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Much evidence has been provided that a therapeutic window of P2Y Methods: In this observational study, we analyzed 860 high-risk patients who were undergoing PCI. The primary endpoint was the correlation between vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI) values with bleeding and ischemic components in high-risk patients. The secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, urgent revascularization, and stroke at 12 months after the index procedure. Results: Among high-risk patients, VASP-PRI could significantly discriminate between PCI patients with and without ischemic events (area under the curve (AUC): 0.77; 95% CI [0.72-0.82]; Conclusion: Our results suggest that high-risk Chinese PCI patients have a narrow therapeutic window. Within this window, high-risk patients are at lower risk for both ischemic and bleeding events. Platelet reactivity may have significant implications for personalized antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.