Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531745›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Fairness-aware K-means clustering in digital mental health for higher education students: a generalizable framework for equitable clustering.

Priyanshu Alluri, Zequn Chen, Thomas Thesen, Nicholas C Jacobson, Wesley J Marrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Priyanshu AlluriDartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
Zequn ChenThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
Thomas ThesenCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03766, United States.
Nicholas C JacobsonCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03766, United States.
Wesley J MarreroThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7092-2292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Higher education students, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds, experience heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and burnout. Clinical informatics approaches leveraging K-means clustering can aid in mental health risk stratification, yet they often exacerbate disparities. We present a socially fair clustering framework that ensures equitable clustering costs across demographic groups while minimizing within-cluster variability. Materials and Methods: Our framework compares standard and socially fair K-means clustering to assess the impact of demographic disparities. It identifies factors affecting clustering across demographics using omnibus and post hoc statistical tests. Subsequently, it quantifies the influence of statistically significant factors on cluster development. We illustrate our approach by identifying racially equitable clusters of mental health among students surveyed by the Healthy Minds Network. Results: The socially fair clustering approach reduces disparities in clustering costs by as much as 30% across racial groups while maintaining consistency with standard K-means solutions in socioeconomically homogenous populations. Discrimination experiences were the strongest indicator of poorer mental health, whereas stable financial conditions and robust social engagement promoted resilience. Discussion: Integrating fairness constraints into clustering algorithms reduces disparities in risk stratification and provides insights into socioeconomic drivers of student well-being. Our findings suggest that standard models may overpathologize middle-risk cohorts, whereas fairness-aware clustering yields partitions that better capture disparities. Conclusion: Our work demonstrates how integrating fairness-aware objectives into clustering algorithms can enhance equity in partitioning systems. The framework we present is broadly applicable to clustering problems across various biomedical informatics domains.

Indexed as

cluster analysismachine learningmedical informaticsmental healthrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41531745
PMCPMC12794019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.