Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531736›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Polarized neural responses to political narratives are sensitive to small variations in self-reported political perspectives.

Niloufar Zebarjadi, Annika Kluge, Enrico Glerean, Matilde Tassinari, Iiro P Jääskeläinen, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti, Jonathan Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niloufar ZebarjadiDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Annika KlugeDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Enrico GlereanDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Matilde TassinariFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Iiro P JääskeläinenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Inga Jasinskaja-LahtiFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jonathan LevyDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an increasingly polarized and divided world, people often interpret new information through an ideologically biased lens (e.g., confirmation bias). Recent studies in the emerging field of political neuroscience report the phenomenon of "neural polarization": cerebral activity that is shared (synchronized) between individuals holding similar political perspectives - but not between those holding dissimilar perspectives. Here, we extend this literature by testing for neural polarization between people with subtly different ideologies. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while individuals (

Indexed as

Health sciencesNeuroscienceSocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID41531736
PMCPMC12794419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.