Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531715›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2025

A New Application for Bolt Cutters in Urogynecology: Challenging Removal of an Impacted Pessary.

Carolyn M Payne, Courtney B Ritchie, Tanaz R Ferzandi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolyn M PayneMid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Springfield, Virginia.
Courtney B RitchieUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Tanaz R FerzandiUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pessaries are commonly used to treat pelvic organ prolapse. While these devices generally pose negligible risk, serious morbidity can be associated with neglected use. Case Presentation: A 91-year-old woman began to experience acute pain related to an impacted pessary. An Exam in the operating room under anesthesia revealed that the pessary was deeply embedded within the vaginal canal and was noted to have a hard metal wire under a rubber exterior. An intraoperative orthopedic consult was obtained to facilitate discussion and selection of tools outside the typical gynecological scope to remove the pessary. A combination of bolt cutters and rongeur forceps were used to successfully remove the pessary. Conclusion: Consideration of instruments outside traditional gynecology including bolt cutters may be considered when faced with a difficult removal of foreign bodies embedded in gynecological tissues.

Indexed as

bolt cutterforeign bodiesimpacted pessarypelvic organ prolapsevaginal fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID41531715
PMCPMC12795255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.