Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531641›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Appendicitis: A Narrative Review.

Mohummed S Alrayes, Mohammed Ahmad Altawili, Ahmed Nasser A Almutawah, Joud Abdulhamid S Alhassun, Abdulelah Mabruk B Alharthi, Omar B Alsheikh Alshahrani, Naif Ayidh Q Alharthi, Omar Mohammed Almithn, Abdulrahman Sultan Abdullah Alahmari, Saleh Waleed Bubshait and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohummed S AlrayesGeneral Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Tabuk, SAU.
Mohammed Ahmad AltawiliGeneral Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Tabuk, SAU.
Ahmed Nasser A AlmutawahGeneral Surgery, King Faisal University, Hofuf, SAU.
Joud Abdulhamid S AlhassunGeneral Practice, Albadai General Hospital, Al Bad', SAU.
Abdulelah Mabruk B AlharthiGeneral Practice, King Faisal University, Hofuf, SAU.
Omar B Alsheikh AlshahraniGeneral Surgery, College of Medicine, Bisha University, Bisha, SAU.
Naif Ayidh Q AlharthiGeneral Surgery, College of Medicine, Bisha University, Bisha, SAU.
Omar Mohammed AlmithnGeneral Surgery, King Faisal University, Hofuf, SAU.
Abdulrahman Sultan Abdullah AlahmariGeneral Surgery, King Faisal University, Hofuf, SAU.
Saleh Waleed BubshaitGeneral Surgery, King Faisal University, Hofuf, SAU.
Moath Mubarak A AlharthiGeneral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency worldwide, conventionally managed through open appendectomy until the advent of minimally invasive techniques. This narrative review gathers current evidence on minimally invasive surgical approaches for appendicitis, such as laparoscopic, single-incision, robotic, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, and endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy, accessibility, and challenges of these techniques while addressing barriers to global implementation and strategies for optimization. Laparoscopic appendectomy is considered the gold standard, offering shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, and fewer surgical site infections compared to open surgery. Innovations such as single-incision laparoscopy and endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy show promise in enhancing cosmetic outcomes and organ preservation but encounter limitations because of technical complexity, costs, and infrastructural requirements, particularly in low-resource settings. Robotic-assisted appendectomy shows better ergonomics and recovery benefits but remains cost-prohibitive for global use. In special populations, like pediatric patients and pregnant women, tailored approaches enhance safety and outcomes. However, significant disparities remain in global access to minimally invasive techniques, caused by economic constraints and training gaps in low- and middle-income countries. In clinical practice, laparoscopic appendectomy is advised where expertise exists, with technique selection guided by patient-specific factors like age, pregnancy, and appendicitis severity. Future efforts must prioritize standardized training, funded equipment, diagnostic algorithms to reduce unnecessary surgeries, and rigorous validation of emerging therapies. Collaborative policy and research initiatives are essential to bridge global differences and achieve evidence-based, minimally invasive management of appendicitis in all populations.

Indexed as

appedicitisendoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapylaparoscopic appendectomyminimally invasivenatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeryrobotic-assisted appendectomysingle-incision laparoscopysurgery

Identifiers

PMID41531641
PMCPMC12794827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.