ReviewCureus2025
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Appendicitis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Disease Severity and Age on Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency worldwide, conventionally managed through open appendectomy until the advent of minimally invasive techniques. This narrative review gathers current evidence on minimally invasive surgical approaches for appendicitis, such as laparoscopic, single-incision, robotic, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, and endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy, accessibility, and challenges of these techniques while addressing barriers to global implementation and strategies for optimization. Laparoscopic appendectomy is considered the gold standard, offering shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, and fewer surgical site infections compared to open surgery. Innovations such as single-incision laparoscopy and endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy show promise in enhancing cosmetic outcomes and organ preservation but encounter limitations because of technical complexity, costs, and infrastructural requirements, particularly in low-resource settings. Robotic-assisted appendectomy shows better ergonomics and recovery benefits but remains cost-prohibitive for global use. In special populations, like pediatric patients and pregnant women, tailored approaches enhance safety and outcomes. However, significant disparities remain in global access to minimally invasive techniques, caused by economic constraints and training gaps in low- and middle-income countries. In clinical practice, laparoscopic appendectomy is advised where expertise exists, with technique selection guided by patient-specific factors like age, pregnancy, and appendicitis severity. Future efforts must prioritize standardized training, funded equipment, diagnostic algorithms to reduce unnecessary surgeries, and rigorous validation of emerging therapies. Collaborative policy and research initiatives are essential to bridge global differences and achieve evidence-based, minimally invasive management of appendicitis in all populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.