ArticleCureus2025
Atlanto-Occipital Dissociation With Catastrophic Neurological Injury: Ethical Challenges in the Intensive Care Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atlanto-occipital dissociation (AOD) is a rare but severe cervical injury usually caused by high-energy trauma and often fatal before hospital admission. Advances in prehospital care have led to more patients surviving long enough for diagnosis, although their prognosis remains poor. We report a 42-year-old man who fell from approximately 5 meters, resulting in cardiorespiratory arrest at the scene. After achieving return of spontaneous circulation, imaging revealed AOD along with severe traumatic brain injury and widespread brainstem damage. Given the absence of neurological viability and the severity of his injuries, no surgical procedures were performed. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit as a potential organ donor. This case highlights the diagnostic and ethical challenges caused by AOD in critical care. Early recognition of this severe injury is crucial, but clinicians must also face complex decisions regarding therapeutic futility and organ donation. An interdisciplinary, evidence-based, and ethically grounded approach remains essential in managing such patients. AOD remains a rare but devastating injury with extremely poor outcomes. This case highlights the importance of early suspicion, accurate diagnosis, and ethically guided decision-making in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.