Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531615›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Papilledema on Fundus Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Samendra Karkhur, Priti Singh, Vidhya Verma, Rama Tulasi Siri Duddumpudi, Arushi Beri, Sumit Satoiya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samendra KarkhurOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Priti SinghOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Vidhya VermaOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Rama Tulasi Siri DuddumpudiOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Arushi BeriOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Sumit SatoiyaOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papilledema, a vision-threatening, raised intracranial pressure manifestation, must be recognized quickly to avoid permanent optic nerve injury. AI techniques and deep learning models, while promising for automating fundus-based detection of papilledema, have shown variable diagnostic accuracies across studies because of varied datasets, differences in grading criteria, and validation methodologies. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA-DTA (Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies) 2020 guidelines in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar from January 2021 to August 2025. Studies that compared any AI-based papilledema detection systems on fundus photos with human or imaging reference standards were allowed. Data from the included studies were combined using a bivariate random-effects model to estimate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The risk of bias in the included studies was appraised with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2). A total of 6 studies with over 15,000 fundus images were included in this review. The pooled sensitivity was 94.6% (95% CI 91.2-97.1). Across six included studies comprising approximately 14,650 fundus images, the pooled diagnostic accuracy of AI-based models for papilledema detection demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.6% (95% CI: 91.2-97.1) and a specificity of 90.3% (95% CI: 86.1-93.5). The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.94, indicating excellent discriminative performance. Between-study heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 42%) and was consistently attributed to differences in dataset size, imaging modalities, and reference standards. Deep learning-based models, such as ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet, consistently outperformed conventional machine-learning algorithms. There was moderate heterogeneity (I² = 42%), and publication bias was not significant. AI analysis of fundus images is found to be highly diagnostic and clinically valid in the detection of papilledema, on par with expert opinion. Additional validation across diverse groups and integration of different modalities of data, such as OCT and ultrasound, can help position AI systems as scalable triage platforms within the emergency, neurology, and teleophthalmology departments, thereby increasing access to neuro-ophthalmic services.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnostic accuracyfundus photographymeta-analysisneuro-ophthalmologypapilledema

Identifiers

PMID41531615
PMCPMC12794944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.