Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531606›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Corpus Callosum Size on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Association With Developmental Delays in Children: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Manik Mahajan, Vikrant Gupta, Smarth Nathyal, Sitikantha Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manik MahajanRadiology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu, IND.
Vikrant GuptaRadiology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu, IND.
Smarth NathyalRadiology, Government Medical College, Jammu, Jammu, IND.
Sitikantha BanerjeeCommunity Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Vijaypur, Jammu, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Developmental delay (DD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of conditions that present with a delay in development or an abnormal pattern of developmental progression. The corpus callosum (CC) is the largest white matter structure in the human brain and connects the cerebral hemispheres. The association between DD and CC thickness is poorly documented. Objectives The main objective of this study is to compare the thickness of various regions of the CC in children with and without DD, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and methods This retrospective case-control study included 70 children aged two to six years (35 children each with DD and normal development). The thickness of the CC was measured on mid-sagittal T1-weighted images according to Witelson's method. Associations between the mean sizes of the different regions of the CC in the case and comparison groups were assessed. Results Delayed speech was the most common presentation of DD, followed by delayed fine motor skills. A significant difference (p < 0.005) was observed between the mean thickness of the CC subdivisions in the case and comparison groups. The difference was most pronounced in the regions of the splenium, anterior body, and genu, with effect sizes of 1.59, 1.33, and 1.15, respectively (Cohen's d values). Significant differences were also observed between the thickness of the genu and splenium in participants who predominantly displayed language delay (p = 0.013). Conclusion Corpus callosal thinning is associated with various DDs in the pediatric age group, and the presence of a thin CC on MRI should trigger evaluation for DD.

Indexed as

corpus callosumdevelopmental delayhypoplasiamagnetic resonance imagingwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID41531606
PMCPMC12793921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.