ArticleCureus2025
Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy in a UK Single-Centre Cohort: A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors and Dosing Trends.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quadrant-Specific Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Hydroxychloroquine Retinal Toxicity: A Controlled OCT-Based Structural and Exposure Analysis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a widely prescribed medication for autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. However, long-term use carries a risk of retinal toxicity. The prevalence of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy is higher than initially thought, and several clinical and pharmacological factors have been implicated as contributors. By optimising its prescription and monitoring, we can minimise preventable visual morbidity. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy within a UK monitoring cohort and assess the impact of recognised risk factors, including daily dose relative to body weight, treatment duration, renal function and concurrent tamoxifen use. Methods A retrospective study was conducted at Watford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, as part of an audit of clinical care. Patients reviewed in the dedicated hydroxychloroquine monitoring clinic between October 2023 and December 2024 were included. Demographic and clinical data were extracted, including age, sex, indication, dose (mg/kg/day), treatment duration, renal function, tamoxifen use, ocular history and evidence of toxicity. Subgroup analyses were carried out. Ethical approval was waived as the study was registered as an audit and was retrospective in nature. Results Data completeness was generally high, with six out of eight data items having reporting of over 90% of the cohort. However, treatment indication and precise dosing data were underreported in some records. A notable proportion of patients exceeded the recommended 5 mg/kg/day dosing threshold. Renal impairment and tamoxifen use were infrequent and not significantly associated with increased risk in this cohort. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with toxicity were older, had been treated for a longer duration and received higher weight-adjusted doses compared to unaffected patients. Conclusion Hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was observed in association with higher doses and longer treatment duration, consistent with international literature. The enhanced reporting of dose and treatment indication, alongside stringent adherence to dosing guidelines, will improve patient safety. These findings highlight the importance of early monitoring and dose optimisation in reducing the risk of irreversible toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.