ArticleCureus2025
Granular Cell Tumour of the Breast: A Rare Mimicker of Carcinoma.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granular cell tumour of the breast is an uncommon benign neoplasm that can closely mimic carcinoma on clinical examination and imaging. We describe a 60-year-old woman who presented with a painless palpable lump in the upper inner quadrant of the left breast. Mammography demonstrated an irregular mass categorised as Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4, and ultrasonography was BIRADS 5. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a 27×20 mm irregular, spiculated, heterogeneously enhancing lesion. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy established the diagnosis of granular cell tumour. The patient underwent breast-conserving wide local excision, and final histopathology revealed a poorly circumscribed tumour composed of cells with abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm, with negative margins and no atypical features. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Surveillance mammography at 12 months was unremarkable, and at 24 months, the patient remains asymptomatic with a normal clinical breast examination and no evidence of recurrence. This case underscores the potential for granular cell tumour to imitate malignancy and highlights the importance of imaging-pathology concordance to avoid overtreatment. When a tissue diagnosis is secured preoperatively, breast-conserving surgery with margin negativity is usually sufficient, and routine clinical and age-appropriate imaging follow-up can document durable control. Our patient's two-year disease-free course supports a conservative, margin-oriented approach to management in similar presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.