ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
%dd-cfDNA: The New Frontier for Heart/Lung Transplant Surveillance?
Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurturing a Sustainable Transplantation Journey: the best of ESOT Congress 2025.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Transplant International: Looking Back at 2025, Looking Forward to 2026.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transplantation improves survival and quality of life, but rejection remains a major threat to allograft longevity. Current surveillance relies heavily on protocols with clinically indicated biopsies, which are invasive, carry procedure-related risks, and have variable sensitivity due to sampling and interpretation limitations. Percent donor-derived cell-free DNA (%dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive blood-based biomarker for allograft injury and a potential rule-out test for rejection. Centralized commercial assays are increasingly used in clinical practice; however, published studies report heterogeneous performance and reveal important blind spots and confounders. This review synthesizes the evidence for %dd-cfDNA in thoracic transplantation, delineates its limitations, and outlines emerging cfDNA methodologies that may reduce reliance on invasive biopsies and enable more individualized monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.