ArticleArtificial intelligence in the life sciences2025
MegaEye: Applying multiple machine learning approaches to identify oral compounds with ocular bioactivity.
Article in Artificial intelligence in the life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The eye is a complex organ with the critical role of mediating the optical and initial signal processing steps of vision. As such, the eye has multiple physiological and dynamic barriers to protect ocular tissues and compartments. Oral administration of pharmacological agents to treat ocular diseases have often failed to demonstrate efficacy in clinical trials. The ability of a molecule to reach a specific target in the eye (e.g. cells in the anterior versus posterior segment) is largely determined by whether its physicochemical properties permit passage across the various ocular barriers (e.g. cornea, sclera, tear dilution, blood-retinal barrier, lymphatic outflow) that are relevant to the route of administration and the target location. The use of machine learning to predict ocular bioactivity of molecules is underexplored. We now describe the curation of several datasets, generated by a wide array of computational approaches, that are used to identify drugs predicted to reach the eye following oral delivery. These datasets included simple molecular properties (e.g. molecular weight), using the blood-brain barrier MPO score, and machine learning models as a proxy for the blood-retinal barrier using transporter and other relevant literature datasets. FDA approved drugs with reported ocular activity were used to validate the models' ability to identify additional molecules not in the models. Finally, we used a large language model, to rank over 400,000 natural compounds by potential activity in the eye. In summary, we illustrate machine learning model applications that can be expanded for ocular applications in future to repurpose molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.