Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531429›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

A robotic model of efficient prey finding in the gleaning bat Micronycteris microtis.

Dieter Vanderelst, Inga Geipel, Herbert Peremans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dieter VanderelstDepartments of Biological Sciences, Electrical & Computer Engineering, and Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8049-5178
Inga GeipelSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Luis Clement Avenue, Bldg. 401 Tupper, Ancon, Panama 0843-03092, Republic of Panama.
Herbert PeremansDepartment of Engineering Management, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3118-2460

Funding

Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie 101026935National Science Foundation 2034885University of Cincinnati
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common big-eared bat (Micronycteris microtis) gleans its prey directly from plant surfaces. Previous experiments have shown that this bat exploits the specular reflection effect to discriminate between occupied and empty leaves. Using this effect requires the bat to position itself such that it can ensonify the leaves at sharp angles. If the bat can perceive the orientation and position of individual leaves, it could position itself to take advantage of the specular reflection. However, this would be a highly inefficient foraging strategy. The bat would first have to inspect each leaf to determine its position and orientation. Given that, under natural conditions, the vast majority of leaves do not feature prey, this would require the bat to spend most of its time collecting information on empty leaves. Here, we propose a strategy that allows a bat to exploit the specular reflection effect without inferring the position and orientation of individual leaves. We implement this strategy on a robotic arm equipped with a sonar head. The robot is tasked with finding a 3D-printed dragonfly on one of a set of artificial leaves. The robot follows an echo amplitude gradient and abandons this search whenever the echoes become too weak. Importantly, the robot does not actively find or locate individual leaves. We show that the proposed sensorimotor model can exploit the specular reflection effect to efficiently and effectively locate prey. Our results increase the plausibility of M. microtis using the specular reflection effect under natural conditions.

Indexed as

ChiropteraPredatory BehaviorRoboticsAnimalsEcholocationPlant LeavesBio-roboticsEcholocationForagingSensory ecology

Identifiers

PMID41531429
PMCPMC12848576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.