ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Neural Dynamics of Social Cognition: A Single-Trial Computational Analysis of Learning Under Uncertainty.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural Dynamics of Social Cognition: A Single-Trial Computational Analysis of Learning Under Uncertainty.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding others' intentions amidst uncertainty is critical for effective social interactions, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this process are not fully understood. Here, we combined computational modeling and single-trial EEG analysis to examine how the brain dynamically updates beliefs about others' intentions in volatile social contexts. A total of 43 healthy volunteers engaged in a deception-free advice-taking task, featuring alternating stable and volatile phases that systematically manipulated the reliability of an adviser's intentions. Using the hierarchical Gaussian filter (HGF), a Bayesian model of learning, we quantified trial-by-trial updates of participants' beliefs and their neural correlates. EEG amplitudes systematically varied according to task volatility, engaging neural regions associated with uncertainty processing such as the fusiform gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex. Sensor-level EEG analyses confirmed a temporal sequence consistent with the hierarchical computations predicted by the HGF, whereby lower-level prediction errors were processed earlier than higher-order volatility-related signals. Moreover, individual differences in these hierarchical neural processes correlated significantly with psychosocial functioning, suggesting that disruptions in Bayesian belief updating may underlie functional impairments in clinical populations. Collectively, our results reveal novel neural evidence for hierarchical Bayesian inference during social learning, highlighting its critical role in adaptive social behavior and potential relevance to mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.