Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41531418›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

Neural Dynamics of Social Cognition: A Single-Trial Computational Analysis of Learning Under Uncertainty.

Colleen E Charlton, Daniel J Hauke, Vladimir Litvak, Michelle Wobmann, Renate de Bock, Christina Andreou, Stefan Borgwardt, Volker Roth, Andreea O Diaconescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Colleen E CharltonKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9342-3533
Daniel J HaukeHawkes Institute, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-9239
Vladimir LitvakDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8535-7452
Michelle WobmannDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Renate de BockDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-2086
Christina AndreouDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Stefan BorgwardtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Volker RothDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreea O DiaconescuKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR-Project Grant)Krembil Foundation 1000824Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 200054Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSK-3 190834Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PZ00P3 167952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding others' intentions amidst uncertainty is critical for effective social interactions, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this process are not fully understood. Here, we combined computational modeling and single-trial EEG analysis to examine how the brain dynamically updates beliefs about others' intentions in volatile social contexts. A total of 43 healthy volunteers engaged in a deception-free advice-taking task, featuring alternating stable and volatile phases that systematically manipulated the reliability of an adviser's intentions. Using the hierarchical Gaussian filter (HGF), a Bayesian model of learning, we quantified trial-by-trial updates of participants' beliefs and their neural correlates. EEG amplitudes systematically varied according to task volatility, engaging neural regions associated with uncertainty processing such as the fusiform gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex. Sensor-level EEG analyses confirmed a temporal sequence consistent with the hierarchical computations predicted by the HGF, whereby lower-level prediction errors were processed earlier than higher-order volatility-related signals. Moreover, individual differences in these hierarchical neural processes correlated significantly with psychosocial functioning, suggesting that disruptions in Bayesian belief updating may underlie functional impairments in clinical populations. Collectively, our results reveal novel neural evidence for hierarchical Bayesian inference during social learning, highlighting its critical role in adaptive social behavior and potential relevance to mental health.

Indexed as

IntentionSocial CognitionSocial LearningSocial PerceptionAdultBayes TheoremComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleUncertaintyYoung AdultEEGfunctioninghierarchical Gaussian filterpredictive codingsocial learningtheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID41531418
PMCPMC12800744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.