ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2025
Entrustable professional activity-aligned workplace-based assessments in the emergency department: perceptions of emergency medicine residents and assessors.
Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Clinical Validation of an Entrustable Professional Activities Framework for Respiratory Nurses: A Longitudinal Workplace-Based Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Required training experience and essential emergency procedures for a competency-based emergency medicine residency program in Korea: two modified Delphi consensus studies.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a competency-based emergency medicine residency training model in Korea.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWorkplace-based assessment (WBA) plays a crucial role in assessing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in the competency-based medical education era. This pilot study explored the perceptions of residents and assessors of two WBAs for three Korean Society of Emergency Medicine EPAs.
methodsEight emergency medicine (EM) residents underwent WBAs, with mini-clinical evaluation exercises (mini-CEX) conducted by nine EM faculty members and multisource feedback (MSF) provided by two internal medicine faculty members and four emergency room nurses, for a total of 69 assessments. We conducted an anonymous online survey to gather feedback on experiences, perceptions, and recommendations for improving WBA, such as mini-CEX and MSF, with responses scored on a 5-point Likert scale.
resultsOf the 23 initial participants, 15 (65.2%) responded, including 5 residents and 10 assessors. EM faculty viewed mini-CEX favorably, noting its strong integration of supervision and effectiveness in assessing resident performance. EM residents reported comfort issues during assessments, preferring immediate feedback and multiple assessors. MSF was generally perceived positively but showed discrepancies in the utilities of rating scales and feedback types, indicating potential areas for improvement.
conclusionTwo WBAs for three Korean Society of Emergency Medicine EPAs were found to be feasible and acceptable in the context of Korean EM residency training. However, perceptions varied between assessors and residents, necessitating clear communication about WBA objectives and processes. Our findings are useful for shaping future EPA-based training programs, balancing traditional and WBA methods, and enhancing feedback quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.