ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2025
Ethical considerations of artificial intelligence in emergency medicine for triage and resource allocation: a scoping review.
Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex-Consistent Performance of an AI-Enabled ECG for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ROMIAE Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to systematically review the ethical and legal discussions regarding the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) for patient triage and resource allocation in emergency medicine, and to identify the current state of discussions, their limitations, and future research directions.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted following scoping review methodology. Relevant literature published after January 2020 was searched in the Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. Based on a PCC (population, concept, and context) framework (emergency patients/medical staff; triage, resource allocation; and emergency medicine with AI application), a final selection of 27 articles was analyzed.
resultsThe selected literature raised various ethical and legal issues related to the introduction of AI triage systems and AI utilization in emergency medicine, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, automation dependency, accountability, and explainability. In response to these issues, human-centered design, implementation of explainable AI, establishment of regulatory frameworks, continuous verification and evaluation, and ensuring human-in-the-loop were discussed as major solutions. However, discussions on the risks of "persuasive AI" that could mislead users, ethical issues of generative AI, and social validation and patient and public involvement were found to be insufficient.
conclusionEthical and legal discussions regarding AI in emergency medicine are evolving toward seeking concrete solutions at technical, institutional, and relational dimensions. However, in-depth research on ethical challenges, such as reflecting the specificity of rapidly developing AI and the values of emergency medicine, is urgently required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.