ArticleMolecular oral microbiology2026
The Outcome of Intracellular Selenomonas sputigena and its Impact on Gingival Keratinocytes.
Article in Molecular oral microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and phenotypic insights into the novel speciesMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of caries induced by sugars: a narratives review from microbial metabolism to oral ecological imbalance and public health strategies for caries prevention.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selenomonas sputigena is an understudied oral pathobiont associated with periodontitis and dental caries. We recently demonstrated that S. sputigena binds to gingival epithelial cells (GECs), where afterwards the bacterium causes robust in vitro pro-inflammatory cytokine production and migration of monocytes and neutrophils. Here, we report that extracellular adherent S. sputigena are subsequently internalized by GECs. Fluorescently labeled intracellular S. sputigena were observed in two gingival keratinocyte cell lines and primary cells. Oxygen-killed S. sputigena was found within GECs at a similar rate to living bacteria, suggesting active protein synthesis is not required for internalization. Host-cell actin polymerization was essential for the internalization of S. sputigena. Electron microscopy revealed that intracellular S. sputigena is located within a single membrane vesicle tightly wrapped around the bacterium which is decorated with LAMP1, indicating that S. sputigena is ultimately trafficked to a lysosome-like vesicle. Although S. sputigena mRNA was detectable within GECs, it rapidly decreased by 24 h post-inoculation. This differed from bacterial morphology, which remained intact up to 48 h. Induction of CXCL8 expression was concurrent with intracellular S. sputigena morphological integrity, suggesting that, while the bacteria are likely dead, bacterial macromolecules perpetuate inflammation in GECs. Collectively, this study demonstrates S. sputigena can be taken into gingival keratinocytes, where the bacterium induces inflammatory responses, but S. sputigena is ultimately processed by lysosomal machinery and is cleared from the intracellular niche in GECs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.