ArticleHarm reduction journal2026
Safer inhalation devices: a rapid Health Impact Assessment of a harm reduction pilot for people who smoke crack cocaine.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople who smoke crack cocaine face significant health risks, including communicable diseases and damage to respiratory health, particularly when using shared or homemade equipment. Despite this, there are currently no targeted harm reduction interventions in Wales for this population. This unique study demonstrates how Health Impact Assessment (HIA) can be used as a process to highlight the wider impacts of a proposed harm reduction pilot of the provision of safer inhalation devices (SIDs) in Wales, and how it has informed future actions and implementation of the scheme.
methodsA participatory HIA was conducted using a structured process facilitated by the Wales Health Impact Assessment Support Unit (WHIASU). Stakeholder engagement included a workshop involving service providers, public health professionals, and individuals with lived experience of crack cocaine use. The process utilised HIA checklists to systematically assess the potential health, social, and economic impacts of implementing a SIDs pilot, as well as unintended consequences.
resultsThe HIA identified a range of positive impacts associated with SIDs, including reduced risk of infections, decreased use of unsafe inhalation equipment, and increased service engagement. Participants emphasised the intervention's potential to reduce stigma and enhance trust, particularly for women, parents, and individuals with a history of adverse childhood experiences. Challenges were also recognised, including potential service strain, funding sustainability, and access barriers for rural populations. Suggested mitigations included mobile outreach and home delivery models. The HIA also highlighted the importance of including lived and living experience to inform future monitoring and service design.
conclusionThis HIA underscores the potential value of an SID pilot in Wales as a means of addressing a critical service gap and reducing health inequalities among people who smoke crack cocaine. It demonstrates the utility of HIA in identifying both potential positive and negative impacts, and in shaping harm reduction strategies that are inclusive, and evidence informed. The findings provide a foundation for pilot implementation and evaluation, as well as a model for integrating HIA into broader public health initiatives and holistic harm reduction services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.