ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026
Putative breast cancer risk variants from populations of South Asian ancestry are under-represented in public variant classification databases.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically interpretable deep learning for breast cancer missense variant pathogenicity prediction.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Exome sequencing reveals broad genetic heterogeneity for neuromuscular disorders in consanguineous Pakistani Families.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The majority of publicly available genomics data originates from populations of European ancestry. This limits understanding and detection of inherited genetic risk factors for breast cancer in other populations. To assess the extent to which deficits in knowledge of the genetics of breast cancer risk exist for populations of non-European ancestry, we compared data available on putative breast cancer risk variants in the ClinVar database for populations of different ancestry. Protein-coding insertions and deletions (indels) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) private to populations of Non-Finnish European (NFE), African (AFR), Admixed American (AMR), East Asian (EAS) and South Asian (SAS) ancestry from the Genome Aggregation Consortium (gnomAD v4) were identified for nine established breast cancer risk genes. The percentage of private protein-coding variants listed as 'Unreported' by gnomAD in ClinVar were compared between populations. The SAS population had the biggest knowledge deficit, as 43.4% of private SAS variants were not reported in ClinVar, compared to 20-30% for other populations. Proportionally fewer SAS variants were reported for all 9 genes, with the difference reaching an adjusted p < 0.05 for PALB2, ATM and BRCA2 when compared to NFE. In contrast, few genes had significantly lower ClinVar reporting rates for AFR, AMR and EAS than for NFE. ClinVar reporting deficits in the SAS population were observed for both missense and protein-truncating variants. Unreported variants were usually very rare and largely absent in other public repositories. A substantial fraction of unreported variants were protein-truncating (17.2%), or missense with high predicted pathogenicity scores, representing novel candidate breast cancer risk alleles. Our work demonstrates putative breast cancer risk variants from populations of South Asian ancestry are less likely to be reported in ClinVar. Defining and removing barriers to reporting potential risk variants for breast cancer from South Asian populations is needed to reduce this knowledge deficit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.