ArticleMalaria journal2026
Cost implications of achieving a gender-integrated indoor residual spraying programme in southern Mozambique.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProgress toward gender equality in the indoor residual spraying (IRS) workforce lags behind other areas of vector control implementation and research. One reason for this may be misconceptions about the cost of implementing IRS with a higher percentage of female staff. The assumption that employing more female spray operators increases costs may stem from the perception that women are less physically capable of performing the demanding work of IRS, resulting in lower productivity and requiring programmes to hire additional staff. The Tchau Tchau Malaria programme in southern Mozambique has achieved high levels of gender equality in its workforce and provides a valuable case study for analysing the impact of gender equality on spray operator salary costs during annual IRS campaigns.
methodsThis study examined data from the 2020/2021 campaign of the Tchau Tchau Malaria programme to understand how employing a high percentage of female spray operators affected the cost of salaries paid to spray operators during the training and implementation phases of the campaign. Salary cost estimates for the actual Tchau Tchau Malaria campaign were compared to a counterfactual scenario assuming a lower percentage of female SOs (30%), consistent with other IRS programmes in sub-Saharan Africa.
resultsApproximately 58.5% of the 2182 spray operators employed by the 2020/2021 Tchau Tchau Malaria campaign were female. Male spray operators were slightly more productive than female spray operators. However, female spray operators were more likely to have worked with previous campaigns; therefore, the average cost of training for female spray operators was lower than the average cost of training for male spray operators. The total salary cost paid to spray operators for the Tchau Tchau Malaria campaign compared with the counterfactual scenario differed by less than 1%.
conclusionsAnalysis of the Tchau Tchau Malaria campaign in Mozambique, when compared to a counterfactual scenario with low gender equality, revealed that achieving a gender-integrated indoor residual spraying workforce had a minimal effect on spray operator salary costs, which represent a significant component of overall IRS programme costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.