ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2026
Patterns, risk factors and management of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy failure in CNS lymphoma.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in molecular pathobiology of PCNSL - towards clinical implementation of novel diagnostics and therapeutics.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Primary central nervous system lymphoma in the molecular era: genomic drivers, liquid biopsy, and targeted therapeutic strategies.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Article
- Unraveling the immune microenvironment in primary CNS lymphoma.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Candidate MRI biomarkers for CD79B status in primary CNS lymphoma: an exploratory radiogenomic analysis of the UCSF-PCNSL cohort.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CD19-CAR) has yielded encouraging efficacy in CNS lymphomas (CNSL), but most patients ultimately experience progressive disease (PD). Risk factors, progression patterns as well as optimal salvage therapies remain unclear.
methodsClinical and radiological characteristics of CD19-CAR failure were therefore retrospectively defined in CNSL treated at Massachusetts General Hospital from 2018 to 2024. PD patterns were defined as local or distant. CNS-progression-free survival from CD19-CAR infusion (CNS-PFS1) and first subsequent progression (CNS-PFS2) were analyzed.
resultsCD19-CAR achieved a 60% overall response rate (45% complete (CR), 15% partial response) in 60 recurrent CNSL. Median CNS-PFS1 was 4 months with radiographic PD in 36 patients (local 23.3%; local and distant 16.7%; distant 20%). PD patterns were associated with prior CD19-CAR response: Distant relapse typically occurred after CR whereas local PD followed CD19-CAR refractory disease. Peripherally contrast enhancing CNSL (pCE) at CD19-CAR infusion correlated with refractory disease. Leptomeningeal involvement (LMD) was associated with recurrence after CR. On multivariable Cox regression, pCE (Hazard ratio [HR]: 2.75; 95%-Confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-6.68, p = 0.03) and LMD (HR: 2.72; CI: 1.20-6.25, p = 0.02) were independently associated with shorter CNS-PFS1. At progression, peripheral CD19
conclusionsThis study identifies novel radiological risk factors for CD19-CAR failure in CNSL, namely pCE and LMD. Outcome in this setting is unfavorable and encouraging salvage treatments warrant prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.