ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Results of a Swiss community-based pilot study on low-dose ct lung cancer screening.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with early detection playing a crucial role in reducing both deaths and healthcare costs. In Switzerland, the Swiss Cancer Screening Committee has conditionally recommended lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Building on prior national experiences, we conducted a pilot study in Ticino to assess recruitment strategies, infrastructure suitability, and facility availability for a potential screening program.
methodsA single round of LDCT was offered to at-risk individuals based on established inclusion criteria (age and smoking exposure, and/or 6-year lung cancer risk). General practitioners (GPs) played a central role in identifying and referring participants, ensuring a more targeted recruitment strategy. Participants were referred to community hospitals trough a dedicated and homogenous pathway involving lung cancer specialists. Visits results and structured CT reports were shared with GPs, and multidisciplinary recommendations were issued in case of suspicious findings. Clinical and psycho-social characteristics of participants were recorded and analyzed.
resultsOver a four-month period, 100 participants were enrolled, with a median lung cancer risk of 3.3% (IQR 2.1–5.6) and a mean smoking history of 42.2 pack-years (IQR 35.9–53.7). Mean age was 63 years, 69% were male and 86% were active smokers. Scattered distribution compared to general population was observed in educational level. The LDCT detected pulmonary nodules in 44% of participants (30% category 1–2, 10% category 3, 4% category 4A), with 32% requiring follow-up imaging (12 LDCT at 12 months, 10 LDCT at 6 months, 2 LDCT at 3 months and 2 PET scans). One case of early-stage lung cancer was identified at baseline scan and 2 at follow-up (lung cancer detection rate 3%); all successfully treated.
conclusionsCompared to previous Swiss studies, our GP-driven approach enabled rapid recruitment and may improve accessibility, particularly for non-urban populations. However, disparities in educational backgrounds among participants suggest that further refinements in outreach strategies are needed. Additionally, the study highlighted the feasibility of integrating LDCT screening within Ticino’s existing healthcare infrastructure, benefiting from its decentralized hub-and-spoke model. These findings provide valuable insights for future lung cancer screening programs in Switzerland, emphasizing the importance of primary care engagement, geographic accessibility, and tailored recruitment strategies to enhance effectiveness and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.