ArticleRespiratory research2026
RAAS antagonists dampen the SARS-CoV-2 infection in ex-vivo cultured human precision-cut lung slices.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is critically involved in pathomechanisms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the role of ongoing therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 inhibitors (ACEi) or Angiotensin-II type 1 receptor (AT
methodsPCLS were pre-treated for 5d with vehicle, LOS or ENA (300 µM), followed by mock infection or infection with SARS-CoV-2 and incubation with vehicle, LOS or ENA for 1d or 2d. Thereafter, PCLS were harvested for analysis of viral replication, inflammatory responses, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and apoptosis pathways.
resultsBoth LOS and ENA significantly reduced viral replication in PCLS, with ENA being more potent. LOS was more efficient than ENA in reducing the expression of IL1B, CCL2, CXCL2 and TNFA, but not of IL6, whereas ENA preferentially caused a reduction of IL6 and CCL2 in SARS-CoV-2-infected PCLS. Further, ENA, but not LOS, significantly decreased the expression of viral entry factors, ACE2 and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), in infected PCLS. Importantly, LOS or ENA did not exert cytotoxic effects.
conclusionsRAAS-antagonizing drugs do not seem to exert detrimental effects during SARS-CoV-2 infection. In opposite, in an ex-vivo model of human PCLS, such treatment was found to dampen SARS-CoV-2 infection and consecutive inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.