ArticleBMC medicine2026
Supplementary biomarker testing in molecular tumor boards increases actionable therapy recommendations: a prospective real-world study of 658 patients.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Recommendation to Implementation: Clinical Outcomes of a Single-Center Molecular Tumor Board.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- Maintaining momentum: the history and future of lung cancer disparities in the United States.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMolecular tumor boards (MTBs) are essential for selecting therapies for patients with rare and advanced cancers. We hypothesized that integrating biomarkers beyond targeted DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) could increase actionable findings. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low status has emerged as a critical biomarker in breast cancer, with potential relevance across other tumor types. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is pivotal for the application of Poly(ADP-Ribose)-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in ovarian and breast cancer, although its role in other malignancies remains unclear. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are expanding precision oncology, with promising biomarkers like Trop-2, Nectin-4, and folate receptor alpha (FRα) showing potential across multiple tumor entities.
methodsTumors were analyzed using the TSO500® panel, enabling tumor mutational burden (TMB) readout. HER2 status was assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), alongside antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) IHC, microsatellite instability (MSI) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), mismatch repair (MMR) IHC, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC, and HRD analysis. Cases were discussed weekly, and outcomes were systematically tracked. Data analysis evaluated the benefit of additional biomarker assessments.
resultsAmong 658 patients, 329 received therapy recommendations, 182 based on supplementary biomarker analyses. One hundred recommendations were implemented, with 37% attributed to supplementary diagnostics. Among 64 response-evaluable patients, the clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 45.3%. HER2-low status notably expanded targeted therapy options across tumor types, with similar implementation rates for HER2-low and HER2-amplified tumors. HRD analysis refined stratification in tumors with mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes beyond BRCA1/2, including PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2. ADC IHC supported 20 recommendations and two therapy implementations.
conclusionsThe integration of additional biomarker assessments into MTB workflows enhances precision oncology by expanding the pool of patients eligible for targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.