ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Fracture stability modifies the risk profile and outcomes of proximal femoral nailing versus hemiarthroplasty for elderly intertrochanteric fractures.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith population aging, intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) in elderly individuals are increasingly common, and the choice between proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) remains under debate, particularly regarding the optimal balance between early mobilization and the risk of long-term implant failure or revision. This study aimed to investigate this trade-off through a retrospective cohort comparison of PFNA and HA in elderly ITF patients stratified by fracture stability.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study reviewed 372 elderly patients with ITF treated from 2016 to 2022. Patients were grouped by surgery (PFNA or HA) and stratified by fracture stability (AO/OTA classification). The primary outcome was the Harris hip score (HHS) at 12 months post-operatively; secondary outcomes included perioperative metrics and complications.
resultsOverall, PFNA group demonstrated higher 12-month HHS (87.9 ± 5.8 vs. 84.6 ± 6.3, p < 0.001) despite longer operative duration, hospital stays, and delayed weight-bearing (p < 0.05) than HA. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference in HHS at 12 months for stable ITF patients. In the unstable subgroup, HA enabled earlier weight-bearing (4.5 ± 3.3 vs. 8.5 ± 3.7 days, p < 0.001), but PFNA demonstrated significantly better 12-month HHS (88.3 ± 6.3 vs. 82.5 ± 6.3, p < 0.001), with less blood loss and lower costs.
conclusionsFor stable ITFs in elderly patients, the PFNA and HA yield comparable outcomes. For unstable ITFs, a clinical trade-off exists: HA provides faster early mobilization, whereas PFNA offers superior long-term hip function. Implant choice should be tailored to patient life expectancy and functional goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.