ArticleBMC public health2026
Health literacy and risk behaviours related to sexually transmitted infections among Portuguese university students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a growing concern for public health worldwide, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. Adolescents and young adults are disproportionately affected. Factual knowledge and personal beliefs seem to play a role in preventing sexual risk behaviours. Furthermore, adequate health literacy has been shown to improve health outcomes. Understanding the determinants of safer sexual practices is essential for developing more effective sexual health education interventions. Accordingly, this study aims to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards STIs and health literacy levels in Portuguese young adults.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among students at the University of Porto from September 2024 to January 2025. An online, structured, and anonymised questionnaire focused on STI aetiology, modes of transmission, clinical aspects, sexual risk behaviours, preventive practices, sociodemographic characteristics, and health literacy. Data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential methods. Lastly, the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and multiple linear regression were used.
resultsAmong 790 participants (median age 22.0 years), 84.0% had already initiated their sexual activity. Around half (49.7%) had problematic health literacy levels. HIV infection, genital herpes, and hepatitis B were the most widely known infections. Meanwhile, 50.9% were unaware of trichomoniasis, and 65.8% did not recognise parasites as potential etiological agents for STIs. Half of them expressed concern about contracting an STI, and similar proportions had used condoms at their last sexual intercourse (47.7%) and had been tested for HIV (51.5%). Regression models revealed that work experience in healthcare and better health literacy predict higher knowledge of STIs. In turn, knowledge was the strongest predictor of better attitudes. Moreover, being female, currently in a relationship, and having had a sexual debut at an older age were associated with safer sexual practices.
conclusionsThis study identifies relevant knowledge gaps, determinants of sexual risk behaviours, and insufficient health literacy levels in Portuguese university students. These findings reinforce the need for accessible, proactive sexual health education interventions capable of empowering individuals and that are tailored to the values and beliefs of today’s youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.