Observational studyBMC psychiatry2026
Management of depression in primary care in Catalonia: a mixed-method study.
Observational study in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConsultations related to major depression have increased significantly in recent years in Primary Care (PC) in Catalonia. PC is key in the approach, so we analysed the training and alignment with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of PC professionals in Catalonia and explored their perceptions of the results obtained.
methodsExplanatory sequential study. Cross-sectional observational study through surveys carried out on nursing and medical professionals and community emotional wellness referents (RBEC), followed by a qualitative study of phenomenological design through focus groups in the same disciplines.
resultsMost professionals feel poorly trained (63.5%) and do not consider themselves aligned (58.3%) with the CPGs. In the focus groups, there was a widespread awareness of the PC approach to depression. It was detected that the lack of homogeneity in clinical practice is due to a lack of both time and resources, and a predominantly pharmacological approach. It was expressed that practical training focused on PC, together with collaborative care, unification of CPGs and working with the social determinants of health could help in harmonisation. Moreover, a certain reluctance towards eHealth in the approach to depression was detected.
conclusionsIt has been detected that professionals feel poorly trained and aligned with CPGs. These results underscore specific aspects like training, the practicality of guidelines, and interdisciplinary collaboration, that warrant further investigation to enhance the treatment of depression within the Catalan healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.