ArticleBMC medical education2026
Retention of basic sciences knowledge at clinical years: a single institute study from Sudan.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking Basic Science Teaching in Medical Education: A Viewpoint on Its Past, Present, and Future.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetention of basic science knowledge is essential for effective clinical reasoning and decision-making in medical education. However, many students face difficulties applying this foundational knowledge during their clinical years.
objectiveTo determine the level of retained basic science knowledge among undergraduate medical students. METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional-single institutional-based study was conducted among medical students of two different batches in the University of Kassala, Sudan, during the academic period spanning 2021 to 2022. Thirty-six single answer questions were used for data collection. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 25.
resultsOut of 185 invited students, 164 completed the exam questions yielding 88.65% response rate. Students' test scores ranged from 19.44% to 88.89%, with an overall average of 57.49 ± 14.60. Notably, 32 students (19.51%) scored ≤ 47%. The average scores between the two student batches were nearly identical (57.67% ± 14.82 and 57.32% ± 14.47), suggesting consistency in performance across batches. Analysis across subject areas revealed that integrated questions consistently produced the highest mean scores in both batches (64.66 ± 19.68 and 62.35 ± 21.07 respectively). Overall, integrated questions had the highest average score at 63.55 ± 20.39, followed by Physiology (60.37 ± 19.31) and Biochemistry (55.22 ± 16.49) while Anatomy recorded the lowest average score (50.81 ± 18.46).
conclusionThis study indicates that how well the undergraduate medical students gaining better retention of basic medical sciences knowledge when it is clinically oriented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.