ArticleBMC public health2026
Discrimination and vigilance as psychosocial pathways from food insecurity to cognitive difficulty among U.S. adults: a moderated mediation analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFood insecurity is a growing public health concern associated with adverse cognitive outcomes and shaped by structural barriers. However, the psychosocial mechanisms linking food insecurity to cognitive difficulty remain underexplored. This study examined whether perceived discrimination and vigilance help explain this relationship and whether these pathways differ by U.S. nativity status.
methodsWe used data from the 2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and analyzed 27,525 adults (23,000 U.S.-born and 4,525 foreign-born) aged 18 and older. Key variables included food insecurity, cognitive difficulty, perceived discrimination, and vigilance. We conducted moderated sequential mediation analyses, with discrimination and vigilance as mediators and nativity as a moderator. Models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, income, and self-rated health.
resultsFood insecurity, discrimination, and vigilance were significantly associated with greater odds of cognitive difficulty. Among U.S.-born individuals, the sequential pathway from food insecurity through discrimination and vigilance was significant (β = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.12), accounting for 52% of the total effect. Among foreign-born individuals, the pathway was also significant and fully mediated (β = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.08), explaining 39% of the total effect. Nativity significantly moderated the full sequential pathway (β = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.03), with stronger mediation observed among U.S.-born adults.
conclusionsDiscrimination and vigilance help explain how food insecurity affects cognitive difficulty. Addressing both material hardship and psychosocial stress may help prevent cognitive decline across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.