ArticleBMC medical education2026
Service user involvement in the education of allied healthcare professionals in Ireland: a mixed-methods exploration.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundService user involvement (SUI) in healthcare education is reported to foster more patient-centred practitioners. However, there is limited guidance as to how authentic SUI can be embedded within educational practice. This study aimed to describe current practices and explore how SUI may be better embedded in the delivery of healthcare education.
methodsA convergent mixed-methods study was undertaken in a higher-level healthcare education department in Ireland. Data were collected via an online survey completed by educators (n = 27) and semi-structured interviews with service users (n = 6). Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Thematic analysis of interview transcriptions was undertaken.
resultsMost educators indicated that SUI was limited to 'one-off' interactions or case-based learning and that there was 'probably' (75%) or 'definitely' (9%) not enough SUI. Both staff and service users reinforced the value of SUI in healthcare education, yet the potential of the role of the service users was not fully realised. Service users described the benefits of their involvement in humanising patients beyond the context of their condition/illness. Several challenges were highlighted, including limited resources, lack of empowerment and insufficient knowledge of the scope of SUI.
conclusionsThe need to educate all stakeholders about the potential for SUI beyond one-off contributions was highlighted. Additionally, engaged leadership is needed to facilitate the contextual integration of processes and procedures to embed the role of service users in higher education. Further investment is needed to advance SUI, which may require additional encouragement from funders, policy makers and regulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.