ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Network meta-analysis with dose-response relationships.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of Plant-Based Drinks on Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Pooled it
- Timing and dose of acupuncture as adjuncts to assisted reproduction: a meta-analysis and model-based network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNetwork meta-analysis (NMA) is a widely used method for synthesizing evidence from multiple interventions for a medical condition. However, NMA applications typically ignore the crucial role of drug dosage on intervention effects. Traditional NMAs either consider each intervention dose as an independent node or ignore the intervention dose, which may impact heterogeneity, inconsistency, or sparsity.
methodsThis paper introduces a novel frequentist approach, termed dose-response network meta-analysis (DR-NMA), which explicitly models the dose-response relationships across multiple interventions. The DR-NMA approach incorporates both linear and nonlinear dose-response relationships, including exponential, quadratic, fractional polynomials, and restricted cubic splines. DR-NMA allows for dose-dependent estimation and prediction of treatment effects across dose ranges, even in disconnected networks if common agents exist. The proposed methods are implemented in the R package netdose, enhancing accessibility and reproducibility. We illustrate the approach using clinical datasets on postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as antidepressant treatments.
resultsOur findings indicate that some dose-response NMA models yield substantially different results compared to standard NMA, emphasizing the critical importance of dose-response function selection in model performance.
conclusionsDR-NMA provides valuable insights into the dose-dependent effects of interventions, enhancing decision-making and offering perspectives beyond traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.