Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530682›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026

Network meta-analysis with dose-response relationships.

Maria Petropoulou, Gerta Rücker, Guido Schwarzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria PetropoulouInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. m.petropoulou.a@gmail.com.
Gerta RückerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Guido SchwarzerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNetwork meta-analysis (NMA) is a widely used method for synthesizing evidence from multiple interventions for a medical condition. However, NMA applications typically ignore the crucial role of drug dosage on intervention effects. Traditional NMAs either consider each intervention dose as an independent node or ignore the intervention dose, which may impact heterogeneity, inconsistency, or sparsity.

methodsThis paper introduces a novel frequentist approach, termed dose-response network meta-analysis (DR-NMA), which explicitly models the dose-response relationships across multiple interventions. The DR-NMA approach incorporates both linear and nonlinear dose-response relationships, including exponential, quadratic, fractional polynomials, and restricted cubic splines. DR-NMA allows for dose-dependent estimation and prediction of treatment effects across dose ranges, even in disconnected networks if common agents exist. The proposed methods are implemented in the R package netdose, enhancing accessibility and reproducibility. We illustrate the approach using clinical datasets on postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as antidepressant treatments.

resultsOur findings indicate that some dose-response NMA models yield substantially different results compared to standard NMA, emphasizing the critical importance of dose-response function selection in model performance.

conclusionsDR-NMA provides valuable insights into the dose-dependent effects of interventions, enhancing decision-making and offering perspectives beyond traditional methods.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicAlgorithmsAntidepressive AgentsHumansReproducibility of ResultsAntidepressive AgentsDose-response relationshipFractional polynomialsNetwork meta-analysisRestricted cubic splines

Identifiers

PMID41530682
PMCPMC12853944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.