ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Scaling emergency care capacity during concurrent public health and humanitarian crises: outcomes of WHO-ICRC basic emergency care course implementation in the Republic of Moldova.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Republic of Moldova, an upper-middle-income nation in Eastern Europe, has encountered overlapping public health and humanitarian challenges that have tested the resilience of its health system. Following the COVID-19 pandemic and 2022 influx of refugees from neighbouring Ukraine, the Ministry of Health (MoH) identified an urgent need to upskill healthcare providers in emergency care. The World Health Organization-International Committee of the Red Cross Basic Emergency Care (BEC) course was selected as a rapid solution to train a range of providers in managing acute patients. This study assessed BEC's effects on emergency care knowledge and confidence in Moldova.
methodsFrom February 2023 to December 2024, 15 BEC courses were taught in Moldova. Participants completed pre- and post-course knowledge tests, confidence self-assessments, and feedback forms. Quantitative scores were assessed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric testing, and qualitative responses were analysed thematically.
resultsOf 371 enrolled participants, 312 (84%) completed all course requirements. Post-course knowledge scores were significantly higher than pre-course (mean score: +20.2%, p < 0.001). Self-reports also improved, with mean scores (ranging from 1 - least - to 4 - most) increasing from 1.85 (SD: 0.91) to 2.17 (SD: 0.67) for confidence (p < 0.001) and 1.58 (SD: 0.79) to 2.07 (SD: 0.61) for competence (p < 0.001). Most (89%) found the course highly relevant to their work and rated instructors as excellent (97%). Participants valued the symptom-based approach, hands-on simulations, short course duration, and interactive teaching, while suggesting more time for hands-on skills practice.
conclusionNational BEC implementation in Moldova showed that a standardized short course can generate significant gains in emergency care knowledge and confidence across diverse provider cadres in a matter of days. Participants gained significant emergency care knowledge and confidence, even though the healthcare system was under immense strain at the time of implementation. The rollout's decentralized delivery and high acceptability underscore its potential for national scalability and integration into existing preparedness frameworks. Moldova's experience demonstrates how targeted education can strengthen surge capacity and sustainably contribute to resilient health systems, even amid crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.