ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2026
Tele-Ophthalmology for Retinal Health Surveillance in Denmark.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this commentary paper, we discuss the potential of population health surveillance of retinal health in Denmark using optometrist-based opportunist retinal examination with tele-ophthalmology pathway. Using 12 months of data from 79 high-street optometrist stores, we imaged 355,818 unique individuals, which corresponds to 5.99% of the entire population of Denmark and equates to an average of 29,652 individuals each month, corresponding to 0.50% of the population. Coverage was highest among those aged 41-80 years, with coverage rates of between 8.17% and 8.68%. We also observed higher participation rates in female individuals (6.77%) than in male individuals (5.19%). Using Wilson score intervals with finite-population correction, we demonstrate that when such a large sample of the entire population is examined, prevalence estimates can be obtained with very narrow 95% confidence intervals. These results suggest that community imaging can provide stable, near real-time indicators of retinal disease at the population level. Selection bias is discussed to understand the limitations of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.