ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Phonetic cue weighting as auditory feature-based selective attention.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listeners use multiple acoustic features, to different extents in different circumstances, in perceiving variable speech signals as streams of phonemes. One class of models conceptualizes this phonetic cue weighting as allocating different amounts of attention to different acoustic features (i.e., attentional theories). These theories posit or assume that similar neural mechanisms underlie phonetic cue weighting and a more general form of auditory feature-based selective attention. We describe multiple attentional theories, consider their relationship to other models of phoneme perception, and review related empirical evidence. In general, attentional theories are able to explain both training-induced and context-dependent cue reweighting. The neuroscientific literature on auditory feature-based selective attention suggests potential neural mechanisms of phonetic cue weighting, including at the single-neuron level. At least three challenges need to be met in order to ascribe all of cue weighting to auditory feature-based selective attention: (1) the complexity of continuous speech, (2) individual differences in cue weighting and selective attention abilities, and (3) any need for specialized neural systems in allocating attention to phonetic cues. To date, using attentional theories to understand speech perception has been fruitful, but more detailed and mechanistic models of feature-based selective attention are needed in order to define the extent to which the attention literature applies in full to cue weighting in speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41530609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.