SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Efficacy and safety of dextromethorphan/quinidine in treating pseudobulbar affect in neurological disorders: A systematic review and dose-classified network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPseudobulbar affect (PBA) is a disabling neuropsychiatric condition characterized by sudden, involuntary episodes of crying or laughing incongruent with mood. It occurs in several neurological disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke, and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Dextromethorphan/quinidine (DM/Q) is the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for PBA, but optimal dosing and safety profiles remain uncertain.
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of different DM/Q dosing regimens for treating PBA through a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted through March 2025. Randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes on the Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS), Visual Analog Scale-Quality of Life (VAS-QOL), Visual Analog Scale-Quality of Recovery (VAS-QOR), and adverse events were included. Analyses were performed using R (netmeta package), and bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool.
resultsFive randomized controlled trials comprising 605 participants were analyzed. DM/Q 20/10 mg and 30/10 mg significantly improved CNS-LS scores (mean difference [MD] - 2.52 and - 2.45, respectively), while DM/Q 30/30 mg produced greater gains in VAS-QOL (MD 17.20) and VAS-QOR (MD 14.90). Dizziness was the only statistically significant, dose-related adverse event.
conclusionDM/Q combination therapy provides effective symptom control for PBA, with favorable tolerability. Both 20/10 mg and 30/10 mg doses improve emotional lability, while 30/30 mg yields additional quality-of-life benefits. Further studies should assess long-term safety and disorder-specific dosing optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41530593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.