Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530566›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

Early Intervention in Psychosis: Perceptions, Strengths, Criticalities, and Improvement Proposals from the Perspective of Italian Mental Healthcare Professionals.

Lorenzo Pelizza, Francesca Mattioli, Emanuela Leuci, Ornella Bettinardi, Luca Loreni, Emanuela Quattrone, Simona Pupo, Fabrizio Starace, Alessio Saponaro, Pietro Pellegrini and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lorenzo PelizzaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum Università Di Bologna, Istituto Di Psichiatria "Paolo Ottonello, Viale Pepoli 5, 40106, Bologna, BO, Italy. lorenzo.pelizza@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4746-2061
Francesca MattioliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum Università Di Bologna, Istituto Di Psichiatria "Paolo Ottonello, Viale Pepoli 5, 40106, Bologna, BO, Italy.
Emanuela LeuciDepartment of Mental Health and Pathological Addictions, AUSL Di Parma, Largo Palli 2, 43100, Parma, PR, Italy.
Ornella BettinardiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, AUSL Di Piacenza, Via Anguissola 15, 29121, Piacenza, PC, Italy.
Luca LoreniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, AUSL Di Piacenza, Via Anguissola 15, 29121, Piacenza, PC, Italy.
Emanuela QuattroneDepartment of Mental Health and Pathological Addictions, AUSL Di Parma, Largo Palli 2, 43100, Parma, PR, Italy.
Simona PupoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pain Therapy Service, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, PR, Italy.
Fabrizio StaraceDepartment of Mental Health and Pathological Addictions, AUSL Di Modena, Via S. Giovanni del Cantone 23, 41121, Modena, MO, Italy.
Alessio SaponaroGeneral Directorate of Health and Social Policies, Emilia-Romagna Region, Via Aldo Moro 52, 40127, Bologna, BO, Italy.
Pietro PellegriniDepartment of Mental Health and Pathological Addictions, AUSL Di Parma, Largo Palli 2, 43100, Parma, PR, Italy.
Marco MenchettiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum Università Di Bologna, Istituto Di Psichiatria "Paolo Ottonello, Viale Pepoli 5, 40106, Bologna, BO, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the 2019 training course on "Early Intervention in Psychosis" (EIP), mental health professionals from all Departments of Mental Health in the Emilia-Romagna region (Northern Italy) were provided with an update on the multi-component intervention program for early psychosis indicated in the current international guidelines. At the end of the training sessions, participants completed the "Scale of Perceived Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction in the Activity of the Psychotherapist" (SAS-P). They also answered open-ended questions, providing opinions on key challenges, suggestions for improvement, and observations on the program's strengths and criticalities. Results showed that psychotherapists felt themselves effective in facilitating therapeutic change, responding to patients' needs, and coordinating multidisciplinary teams. However, they reported difficulties in managing work-related stress, maintaining a suitable psychotherapeutic setting in public services, and influencing organizational structures. Open-ended responses highlighted other key challenges, including limited resources, poor integration between services, and communication gaps within teams. In conclusion, the findings highlight disparities among local mental health services in implementing the specialized EIP program. They also emphasize the need to address these challenges to ensure more effective and consistent interventions.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEarly Medical InterventionHealth PersonnelMental Health ServicesPsychotherapistsPsychotic DisordersAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleEarly Intervention in PsychosisFirst episode psychosisPerspectiveProfessionalQualitative researchStaff Members

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.