ArticleJournal of human genetics2026
Maternal copy number variations detected by noninvasive prenatal testing in Japanese women.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening method that detects fetal chromosomal trisomies from cell-free DNA in maternal blood. Because NIPT uses whole-genome sequencing with next-generation sequencing for data processing, it can also detect maternal genomic information. Although most copy number variations (CNVs) are benign, some have been reported to be associated with pathological phenotypes and are attracting increasing attention. However, most CNV studies have been conducted in Western populations, and large-scale studies in Japanese cohorts remain scarce. This study represents the first multicenter, large-scale cohort investigation of maternal CNVs in Japanese pregnant women. We analyzed 46,082 participants to establish a reliable threshold for maternal CNV detection and to evaluate their clinical significance. Maternal CNVs were validated using array comparative genomic hybridization, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 0.8 Mbp as the minimum threshold achieving 100% specificity. Applying this criterion, maternal CNVs were identified in 2907 cases (6.3%), with the most frequent being a duplication at chr8: 3,842,478-6,092,478 (hg38, allele frequency 2.67%). Comparison with public genomic databases, including the Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (ToMMo) and the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), confirmed that all CNVs detected in this study had been previously reported, with particularly high concordance in ToMMo. Notably, several very rare CNVs were also identified. These findings demonstrate that NIPT can reliably detect maternal CNVs ≥0.8 Mbp, which appear to represent benign genomic variants that are unlikely to affect fertility or early miscarriage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41530548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.