ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2026
Healthcare Cost Associated with an Acute Mental Healthcare Bundle in Pediatric Emergency Departments.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate healthcare cost associated with a standardized mental healthcare bundle in two tertiary pediatric emergency departments (EDs) in Alberta, Canada.
methodsWe linked data from the two EDs and administrative health databases. Patients < 18 years presenting with mental health concerns were enrolled during two periods: pre-implementation (standard care) and implementation (mental health bundle). Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were compared over 12 months following the initial ED visit.
resultsThe study included 686 pre-implementation (mean age 12.6 years) and 692 implementation (mean age 13.0 years) patients with similar sex distribution (p = 0.65). Implementation patients had lower admission rates at the index ED visit (4.6% versus 9.8%; p < 0.001). During 1 year of follow-up, implementation patients had fewer hospitalizations (mean = 0.4 versus 0.5; p < 0.001), non-ED ambulatory care visits (mean = 2.7 versus 10.0; p < 0.001), and practitioner claims (mean = 34.3 versus 46.8; p = 0.001). Implementation patients had lower healthcare costs ($12,408 [95% CI $10,336-$14,479] versus $19,326 [95% CI $16,596-$22,056]; p < 0.001) attributable to lower hospitalization ($6845 [95% CI $5257-$8435] versus $9994 [95% CI $8205-$11,782]; p = 0.01), ambulatory care ($1711 [95% CI $1383-$2038] versus $4027 [95% CI $3326-$4727]; p < 0.001), and practitioner ($3851 [95% CI $3410-$4292] versus $5306 [95% CI $4676-$5935]; p < 0.001) expenses during the follow-up. After risk adjustments, care bundle was associated with a 40% [95% CI 26-52%] reduction in mental health-related healthcare costs (p < 0.001) and 37% (95% CI 23-49%) reduction in all-cause healthcare costs (p < 0.001).
conclusionsIntegrating a standardized mental healthcare bundle in pediatric EDs was associated with less healthcare use and cost savings. These findings support its broader use to enhance mental healthcare delivery in emergency settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.