ArticleScientific reports2026
An AI-based algorithm for analyzing physical activity and health-related fitness in youth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying and alleviating ethical risks of artificial intelligence in physical education: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, with the country's emphasis on national fitness, the health status of primary and secondary school students has become the focus of social attention. As one of the important means to measure students' physical fitness, physical examination results are closely related to students' physical fitness. However, there are some problems in the traditional physical examination management, such as subjective influence, complicated manual calculation, and difficulty in retaining and making full use of data. Based on the physical fitness test data of primary schools in the past five years from 2018 to 2022, this study aims to apply machine learning and deep learning methods to deeply analyze and mine data information, provide automatic classification methods and accurate performance prediction models, and then expand to provide students with personalized training suggestions to assist teachers in making reasonable teaching plans and other applications. The first research method is the classification method based on BP neural network, which realizes automatic comprehensive grade classification and achieves 98.448% classification performance, and explores students' physical health and grade classification. The second research method is the performance prediction model based on CNN-LSTM neural network, which combines CNN feature matrix and LSTM continuous time series information to provide more accurate performance prediction for various physical test items, and provides a new method for the management and evaluation of physical test results of primary and secondary school students through data analysis and prediction model. These methods not only solve the problems of traditional evaluation methods, but also provide scientific guidance for schools and promote the healthy development of students and the optimization of physical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.