ArticleScientific reports2026
Energy optimization of PV systems under partial shading conditions using various technique-based MPPT methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic analysis of GWO-Fuzzy MPPT technique applied to a SEPIC converter under partial shading conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental investigation on the effect of real environmental factors on photovoltaic module power output in Southern Algeria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance comparison of MPPT controllers in a grid-connected PV system: LCOE and payback period approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the problems associated with the nonlinear power-voltage characteristics of photovoltaic (PV) systems, especially under partial shading conditions (PSC), which reduce energy efficiency and tracking accuracy. To overcome these limitations, two improved maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controllers based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) techniques are proposed. The controllers are designed with a suggested architecture that uses the power-voltage derivative ([Formula: see text]) and the voltage time derivative ([Formula: see text]) as input features, enabling predictive, non-iterative control. This approach eliminates the steady-state oscillations inherent in conventional perturb-and-observe (P&O) algorithms and achieves superior dynamic response under rapidly changing environmental conditions. Simulation results demonstrate significant improvements compared with the traditional P&O method. The proposed ANN and ANFIS controllers achieved average tracking efficiencies ([Formula: see text]) of 99.4% and 99.75%, respectively, with a response time reduction of about 55% and steady-state oscillation suppression exceeding 70%. The ANFIS controller exhibited higher stability, reducing the duty-cycle fluctuation index ([Formula: see text]) by approximately 20% compared with the ANN controller, resulting in smoother and more reliable power extraction. A comparative evaluation with recently published metaheuristic and hybrid AI-based MPPT approaches confirmed that the proposed ANFIS model achieves equal or better performance while maintaining very low computational complexity. The average execution time per control step remained below 0.2 ms, confirming the suitability of both controllers for real-time deployment on low-cost digital signal processors (DSPs). These findings demonstrate that the proposed intelligent MPPT framework provides a fast, accurate, and computationally efficient solution for improving the reliability and energy yield of PV systems operating under dynamic and partially shaded conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.