Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530511›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A machine learning approach for opioid overdose risk prediction among Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid prescriptions.

Jason Parton, Qin Wang, Eric C Wang, Courtney Hanson, John A Higginbotham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason PartonInstitute of Data and Analytics, Culverhouse College of Business, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA. jmparton@ua.edu.
Qin WangInstitute of Data and Analytics, Culverhouse College of Business, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Eric C WangInstitute of Data and Analytics, Culverhouse College of Business, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Courtney HansonInstitute of Data and Analytics, Culverhouse College of Business, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
John A HigginbothamInstitute of Data and Analytics, Culverhouse College of Business, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study is to develop and validate a machine learning approach for predicting opioid overdose risk and identifying associated risk factors among Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries during the period of 2016–2023. Using the administrative claims data, we trained three machine learning models, penalized logistic regression, random forest and gradient boosting machines, on the 2016–2018 data with 168,625 records, and test and validate the models on the 2019–2023 data with 229,212 records. A modern sampling approach, SMOTE, was incorporated into the study to deal with the imbalance in the overdose outcome. The machine learning models demonstrated strong performance assessed by C-statistics, sensitivity and specificity, precision and recall rates, etc. Several risk factors were identified including changes in prescription patterns, beneficiary’s age, and prescription denials. Differences in ROC-AUC and PR-AUC between models with and without SMOTE were modest; interpretation therefore emphasizes improvements in recall rather than overall discrimination. SMOTE-based performance metrics were averaged across 50 resampling iterations to reduce instability from single-run oversampling.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidMachine LearningMedicaidOpiate OverdoseAlabamaBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRisk FactorsUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidClass imbalanceMachine learningOpioid overdoseRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41530511
PMCPMC12881380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.