ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of the war on forest ecosystem in Ukraine based on Sentinel-2 data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forests play a vital role in ecology, economy, urban planning, and social well-being, emphasising the importance of monitoring forest cover and its changes. The study evaluates the ecological impact of the military conflict on forest ecosystem in Ukraine using a time series of Sentinel-2 data and machine learning algorithms. Forest losses following the beginning of the war were derived using a change detection method across the study areas. Two types of forest loss were delineated: conversion of woody areas to non-woody cover, and burnt forest. Before the war, forest loss was predominantly due to the conversion of woody to non-woody cover, accounting for 74% of total changes, while forest fires represented the remaining 26%. Following the outbreak of the conflict, the total area of forest loss doubled. Notably, the proportion of forest converted to non-woody cover decreased to 66%, while the proportion of burnt forest increased to 34%, evidencing the severe impact of military operations on forest ecosystem. Of interest, the area of forest converted to non-wood cover doubled between, possibly reflecting an increased demand for wood due to the conflict, potentially driven by a rise in legal and illegal logging as a result of weakened governance and reduced enforcement of environmental regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.