ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative analysis of enzymatic defence mechanisms in Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. and Acacia concinna (Willd.) DC. using a Michaelis-Menten kinetic model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares the enzymatic antioxidant defence responses of two saponin-rich species, Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. and Acacia concinna (Willd.) DC. Dried fruit powders were analysed for catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities using standard spectrophotometric assays. Distinct interspecific variations were observed Acacia concinna (Willd.) DC. showed higher enzymatic activity, whereas Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. exhibited comparatively higher polyphenol oxidase activity. Enzyme kinetic parameters (Vmax and Km) were estimated using Michaelis-Menten modelling and Lineweaver-Burk plots. Acacia concinna (Willd.) DC. demonstrated lower Km and higher Vmax values for most enzymes, indicating superior catalytic efficiency and substrate affinity. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) revealed that the first two discriminant functions accounted for 96.53% of the total variance, and post hoc test (P = 0.05) confirmed significant differences in enzymatic profiles. The present study highlights the residual enzymatic potential, kinetic adaptability and biochemical composition of these saponin-rich species, emphasizing the role of enzyme efficiency in physiological stress defence response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.