ArticlePediatric research2026
Individual response to continuous and interval training on cognitive and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in adolescents with overweight/obesity.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effects of different exercise intensities on cognitive outcomes and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) concentrations in adolescents with overweight/obesity are not yet fully elucidated. This study aimed: (a) to compare the prevalence of responders to cognitive function and BDNF concentration in adolescents with overweight/obesity participating in a 12-week intervention with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), and (b) to analyze whether cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) can explain differences in inter-individual variability between responders and non-responders.
methodsAdolescents with overweight/obesity were assigned to HIIT (n = 15), MICT (n = 14), or CG (n = 24). Anthropometrics, body composition, CRF, basal BDNF, and cognitive performance (Trial Making Test (TMT) and Stroop Test (ST)) were evaluated pre- and post-intervention. Training was performed on stationary bikes (3×/week for 12 weeks).
resultsThe prevalence of responders in ST and TMT was higher in the HIIT group than in CG (93-62%, p = 0.029; 67-33%, p = 0.043), with no differences in MICT. No group differences were found for BDNF responders (HIIT:73%-MICT:71%-CG:46%, p = 0.263). ST and TMT responders had greater CRF improvements than non-responders.
conclusionHIIT elicited a higher prevalence of cognitive responders than CG. CRF improvements may partially explain individual variability in responsiveness to cognitive outcomes. IMPACT: This is the first study to examine and compare inter-individual variability in cognitive function and BDNF levels following MICT and HIIT interventions in adolescents with overweight/obesity; Exercise intensity and improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness are key factors for optimizing the cognitive effects of interventions in youth with overweight; Twelve weeks of supervised HIIT and MICT training led to increased rates of cognitive responders among adolescents with overweight/obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41530492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.