ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Therapeutic responses in patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled in early-phase clinical trials at MD Anderson.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated clinical outcomes and safety profiles in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in early-phase trials. A retrospective review of 546 NSCLC cases treated from January 2016 to December 2024 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was performed using the MD Anderson CHIMERA database. Patients were categorized into seven groups based on treatment regimen. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 19.9%, and the highest ORRs were in the targeted combination (30.8%) and targeted monotherapy (29.7%) groups. Gene alteration-matched therapy, serum albumin level, metastatic burden, treatment group, and liver metastasis were independently associated with progression-free survival. For overall survival, albumin level, metastatic burden, liver metastasis, and treatment regimen group showed independent significant associations. While overall safety profiles were tolerable, combination regimens were associated with increased proportions of grade ≥3 adverse events and dose modifications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.